In a high-stakes political dialogue with the Chief Advisor (CA), the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and the Nationalist Consensus Party (NCP) locked horns over the timing of the upcoming national election.
BNP’s representative Salahuddin Ahmed made it clear that his party would not support any election date beyond December 31, arguing that all necessary reforms—except constitutional amendments—can be completed within one month.
"Any reform that doesn’t involve constitutional change can be implemented within four weeks," Salahuddin said, emphasizing the urgency of holding elections within the calendar year.
Heated words were exchanged when NCP leader Nahid criticized some parties for 'echoing India’s stance' by insisting on a December election. 'Some groups are repeating India's position word for word,' he claimed.
Salahuddin responded sharply, “If wanting a December election means echoing India, then those pushing for a delay are surely speaking in the tone of the US or China.”
The clash between BNP and NCP quickly overshadowed the dialogue’s original agenda of electoral reform, turning the discussion into a debate over election timing.
Following the meeting, Salahuddin reaffirmed BNP’s position to reporters: “We believe a national election is fully achievable within December. Electoral reforms can be implemented through executive orders within a month—there is no justification for delay.”
In contrast, NCP convener Nahid argued against announcing an election date before completing reforms outlined in the July agreement.
“After waiting 16 years and another 10 months, waiting two more months is reasonable. Let’s allow the government time to build consensus for fair elections,” he said.
He added that a credible election demands urgent reform of the election system and the Election Commission, including legal updates and reconstitution to ensure transparency and trust.
